Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009

General Information

Note

Giving Deference to Inaction: How Geddes v. United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical Plan Compromised an Employee's Right to Meaningful Review Under ERISA

Erin Nave

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 323-347

The Fair Housing Act, the Communications Decency Act, and the Right of Roommate Seekers to Discriminate Online

Kevin M. Wilemon

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 375-401

Avoiding the Problem of the Commons in a Communist Society: The Role of Water Rights in the Enforcement of Environmental Law in China

Sonja Schiller

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 349-374

Home Alone: Is This the Best We Can Do? A Proposal to Amend Pending Parental Leave Legislation

Caldwell G. Collins

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 301-322

Introduction

Introduction: Empirical Research on Decision-Making in the Federal Courts

Andrew D. Martin

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 001-003

Essay

The Ideology of Legal Interpretation

Sara C. Benesh and Jason J. Czarnezki

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 113-132

Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Do Justices Tip Their Hands with Questions at Oral Argument in the U.S. Supreme Court?

Timothy R. Johnson, Ryan C. Black, Jerry Goldman and Sarah A. Treul

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 241-261

A New Look at Judicial Impact: Attorneys' Fees in Securities Class Actions After Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.

Theodore Eisenberg, Geoffrey P. Miller and Michael A. Perino

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 005-035

What Is Judicial Ideology, and How Should We Measure It?

Joshua B. Fischman and David S. Law

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 133-214

How Should We Study District Judge Decision-Making?

Pauline T. Kim, Margo Schlanger, Christina L. Boyd and Andrew D. Martin

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 083-112

Judicial Agenda Setting Through Signaling and Strategic Litigant Responses

Vanessa Baird and Tonja Jacobi

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 215-239

The Intersection of Judicial Attitudes and Litigant Selection Theories: Explaining U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making

Jeff Yates and Elizabeth Coggins

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 263-299

An Examination of Strategic Anticipation of Appellate Court Preferences by Federal District Court Judges

Christina L. Boyd and James F. Spriggs II

2009-01-01 Volume 29 • Issue 1 • 2009 • 037-081