Form Contracts Under Revised Article 2

Abstract

Consider the Arizona cases with due recognition of the fact that they are interpreting section 211(3) of the Restatement, and not Revised 2-206(a), and with the understanding that the sample consists of twenty-five cases, only seven of which come from the Arizona Supreme Court led by a powerful Justice who had a clear vision about the evils of form contracts. Understand too that most of them involve insurance disputes. Although each of these qualifications might make the Arizona experience unrepresentative, it is the best we have, and I, at least, find it instructive.

Keywords

Standardized terms of contract, Consumer protection

Share

Authors

James J. White (University of Michigan Law School)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 08671d052c7f4984fdc05c973ec78812