Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)
Case Comment
Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)
Case Comment
Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)

Keywords

Dismissal and nonsuit, Res judicata, Stockholders, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)

Download

Download pdf
View PDF

Share

Download

Issue

Publication details

Pages 219-227
Publication Washington University Law Quarterly

Dates

Published 1973-01-01

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 41119f2c0412feb0366183a59865023e