Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)

Case Comment

Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)

Author:

Abstract

Keywords: Dismissal and nonsuit, Res judicata, Stockholders, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)

How to Cite: (1973) “Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)”, Washington University Law Review. 1973(1).