Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)
Case Comment
Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)
(1973) 'Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972)',
Washington University Law Review.
1973(1)
:219-227.
Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972). Washington University Law Review. 1973 1;
1973(1)
:219-227.
(1973, 1 1). Dismissal of Stockholders’ Derivative Actions As Res Judicata—The Requirement of Notice of Proposed Dismissal, Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1972).
Washington University Law Review
1973(1)
:219-227.
