Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)
Case Comment
Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)
Case Comment
Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)

Keywords

People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.), Canine searches, Narcotic laws, Police dogs, Searches and seizures, California

Share

Authors

Rachel F. Best (Washington University School of Law)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Pages 641-657
Publication Washington University Law Quarterly

Dates

Published 1983-01-01

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 0773dfbaa8d64a1e09b7cd489c170796