Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)

Rachel F. Best

Case Comment

Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)

Author: Rachel F. Best (Washington University School of Law)

Abstract

Keywords: People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.), Canine searches, Narcotic laws, Police dogs, Searches and seizures, California

How to Cite: Best, R. (1983) “Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)”, Washington University Law Review. 61(2).