Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)

Case Comment
Random Canine Sniff Searches Do Not Violate Fourth Amendment, People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.)

Keywords

People v. Mayberry, 644 P.2d 810 (Cal.), Canine searches, Narcotic laws, Police dogs, Searches and seizures, California

Rachel F. Best (Washington University School of Law)

Pages	641-657
Publication	Washington University Law Quarterly

Published	1983-01-01