Exploring the “Myth of Parity” in State Taxation: State Court Decisions Interpreting Public Law 86—272

Abstract

Although several scholars have explored the question of parity between federal and state courts in a variety of other contexts, the empirical question whether state courts are systematically biased against taxpayers seeking the protection of federal law has gone largely unexamined. This Essay offers a preliminary exploration of that issue. Specifically, it presents a study of all reported state court decisions interpreting Public Law 86–272, a federal statute enacted in 1959 that provides businesses with immunity from state income taxes when they keep their activities in the taxing state beneath a specific threshold. State court decisions interpreting Public Law 86–272 may provide a means for measuring systemic bias.

Keywords

Income tax -- United States -- States, Intergovernmental tax relations, Law -- Interpretation & construction -- United States -- States, Federal jurisdiction

Share

Authors

Bradley W. Joondeph (Washington University School of Law)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 9fe90aec0897a4e479f3b9b7e660ec11