Informed Consent as Compelled Professional Speech: Fictions, Facts, and Open Questions

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between a physician’s First Amendment right to free speech and state informed consent mandates. Sawicki details the convoluted jurisprudence surrounding consent mandates, focusing on one-sided and controversial subject matter that many states require physicians to disclose. Sawicki then offers a legal framework for how a physician-challenged consent mandate may pass through the court system based on existing Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Keywords

First Amendment, Physician speech, Healthcare, Professional speech, Regulation, Informed consent

Share

Authors

Nadia N. Sawicki (Loyola University Chicago School of Law)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 3445dc8a2695218995959a773d7f06e6