Censorship Makes the School Look Bad: Why Courts and Educators Must Embrace the "Passionate Conversation"


This Article analyzes the Supreme Court’s decision in Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. The Court held that students have no freedom to choose the content of school-sponsored newspapers or other curricular vehicles, so long as the justification for censorship is “reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.” LoMonte argues the Court erred in elevating the government’s reputation to a concern of constitutional value. LoMonte urges the Supreme Court to re-think its decision as it has done with respect to persons in other categories. Young people use their talents to organize reform movements and have political opinions worth hearing, particularly about the education they are receiving.


Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, school, schools, education, educational institution, newspaper, school-sponsored, censor, censorship, First Amendment, Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States, SCOTUS



Frank D. LoMonte (University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida)



Publication details



All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: aac4cd038f200e73943b48c25fab4c47