Skip to main content
Note

"Yes Harm, No Foul": Recalibrating Qualified Immunity

Author: Noah Watson (Washington University School of Law)

  • "Yes Harm, No Foul": Recalibrating Qualified Immunity

    Note

    "Yes Harm, No Foul": Recalibrating Qualified Immunity

    Author:

Abstract

The current state of qualified immunity allows victims to be violated but not vindicated. The judicial created doctrine of qualified immunity has been strongly supported by the Supreme Court. Recently, opposition has increased from legal commentators, members of Congress, and judges across political and ideological lines. This Note analyzes qualified immunity and proposes bringing the doctrine back in line with its common-law foundation. Watson proposes reinstating the original applicability of § 1983 and returning to a common-law understanding of qualified immunity. Watson advocates for keeping officials accountable while protecting officials from burdensome litigation, and better serving justice for those whose rights have been violated.

Keywords: qualified immunity, constitutional rights, constitution, section 1983, common law

Downloads:
Download pdf
View PDF

Published on
2021-01-01