Third Circuit's Rejection of Caveat Emptor in CERCLA Contribution Claims Imposes Double Liability on Remote Vendors: Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex, 851 F.2d 86
comment
Third Circuit's Rejection of Caveat Emptor in CERCLA Contribution Claims Imposes Double Liability on Remote Vendors: Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex, 851 F.2d 86
comment
Third Circuit's Rejection of Caveat Emptor in CERCLA Contribution Claims Imposes Double Liability on Remote Vendors: Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex, 851 F.2d 86

Keywords

Corporate successor liability, Liability for hazardous substances pollution damages

Download

Download pdf
View PDF

634

Views

305

Downloads

Share

Authors

Kathleen D. Lindenberger (Washington University School of Law)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Pages 273-288
Publication Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law

Dates

Published 1990-01-01

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: fed998d0f981a45b28e91583a47a08ff