F. Hodge O'Neal Corporate and Securities Law Symposium
Author: Jay Conison (Oklahoma City University)
This Article has two aims: first, to show that there is indeed little to guide courts in interpreting section 514(a), and second, to show that despite this lack of guidance, courts can still apply the provision rationally.
Keywords: Preemption (Legislative power), Qualified benefit plans, Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, United States, Employee fringe benefits, Federal preemption (Labor law)
How to Cite: Conison, J. (1994) “ERISA and the Language of Preemption”, Washington University Law Review. 72(2).