Why a Narrowly Defined Legal Scholarship Blog Is Not What I Want: An Argument in Pseudo-Blog Form

Abstract

Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blogging, in particular legal blogging. This comment argues that aside from being intrinsically rewarding, blogging offers a concise scholarly model addressing a wider-ranger of topics. In this way, the paper claims that blogging has the potential for self-discovery and innovation in a way that legal scholarship might not.

Keywords

Blogs, Law -- Study & teaching, Pseudonyms, United States

Share

Authors

Ann Althouse (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 6ca7cc30dcded8014e103f13fbb2f95f