Symposium
Author: A. Michael Froomkin (University of Miami)
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultimately asks the question -- what are blogs good for? This paper puts forth the argument that law blogs are a great tool for the sharing, organization, and development of ideas. At the same time, the limitations of blogging when dealing with complex, lengthy material are recognized.
Keywords: Law -- Study & teaching, Blogs, Legal literature, United States
How to Cite: Froomkin, A. (2006) “The Plural of Anecdote Is “Blog””, Washington University Law Review. 84(5).