VanGrack's Explanations: Treating the Truth As a Mere Matter of “Form”

Abstract

The inaccuracies in Adam VanGrack’s Note, and new problems with his present explanation, lead us to conclude that it is not useful to exchange views with him in the Washington University Law Quarterly. Beyond all is Mr VanGrack’s dismissal of matters serious enough to trigger an extraordinary instruction to explain himself in print, and to prompt him to rescind statements published only a few months ago, as mere “semantic complaints.”

This reply seeks to discuss the authors' data-sharing arrangements.

Keywords

Social sciences, Peer review (Professional performance), Law -- Periodicals, Capital punishment

Share

Authors

Jeffrey Fagan (Columbia Law School)
James S. Liebman (Columbia Law School)
Valerie West (Columbia Law School)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: e5d10b41a1669a81dafd1dfc808b58a8