Discrimination by Private Clubs


The fierce defense of a private right to discriminate in club membership, exemplified by Justice Douglas' Moose Lodge opinion, is one of the glories and contradictions of our constitutional system; and, as Virginia Woolf deftly observes, exercise of the right even in a seemingly benign form imposes real harm on those excluded. The paradigm case that I will be discussing grows out of the controversy that may occur when a private organization or association, which might loosely be called a "club," excludes from membership certain people because of their racial, ethnic, sexual, or religious identity. The legal and human problems presented by such a case involve a conflict between the interest in being treated equally and the interest in being free to choose one's own personal relationships. Converted to a clash of rights, under federal or state law, the paradigm case becomes a collision between a right to be free from discrimination and a "right to discriminate" stemming from freedom of association.


Freedom of association



William G. Buss (University of Iowa)



Publication details



All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 2bc577b82c1e7831dfbd694e6f3376a1