Plaintiffs Cannot Establish a Prima Facie Case of Age Discrimination by Showing Disparate Impact Within the Protected Group. Lowe v. Commack Union Free School Dist., 886 F.2d 1364 (2d Cir. 1989)
Author:
Terrence J. Dee
(Washington University School of Law)
Case Comment
Plaintiffs Cannot Establish a Prima Facie Case of Age Discrimination by Showing Disparate Impact Within the Protected Group. Lowe v. Commack Union Free School Dist., 886 F.2d 1364 (2d Cir. 1989)
Author:
Terrence J. Dee
(Washington University School of Law)
Dee,
T.
(1991) 'Plaintiffs Cannot Establish a Prima Facie Case of Age Discrimination by Showing Disparate Impact Within the Protected Group. Lowe v. Commack Union Free School Dist., 886 F.2d 1364 (2d Cir. 1989)',
Washington University Law Review.
69(1)
:337-348.
Dee,
T.
Plaintiffs Cannot Establish a Prima Facie Case of Age Discrimination by Showing Disparate Impact Within the Protected Group. Lowe v. Commack Union Free School Dist., 886 F.2d 1364 (2d Cir. 1989). Washington University Law Review. 1991 1;
69(1)
:337-348.
Dee,
T.
(1991, 1 1). Plaintiffs Cannot Establish a Prima Facie Case of Age Discrimination by Showing Disparate Impact Within the Protected Group. Lowe v. Commack Union Free School Dist., 886 F.2d 1364 (2d Cir. 1989).
Washington University Law Review
69(1)
:337-348.
