The Ever Widening Scope of Fact Review in Federal Appellate Courts—Is the “Clearly Erroneous Rule” Being Avoided?
Article
The Ever Widening Scope of Fact Review in Federal Appellate Courts—Is the “Clearly Erroneous Rule” Being Avoided?
Article
The Ever Widening Scope of Fact Review in Federal Appellate Courts—Is the “Clearly Erroneous Rule” Being Avoided?

Abstract

The expansion that has occurred in the federal courts is of principal concern to this writer.

Keywords

Appeals (Law), Appellate courts, Law and fact, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, United States

Download

Download pdf
View PDF

Share

Authors

John F. Nangle (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Pages 409-429
Publication Washington University Law Quarterly

Dates

Published 1981-01-01

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 9622081c7c620726720b67fed24d5ca8