Conference Proceeding

Grammar and Inferences of Rationality in Interpreting the Child Pornography Statute

Authors: Jeffrey P. Kaplan (University of Chicago) , Georgia M. Green (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

On November 29, 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., a case which sharply divided participants at the symposium conference. Our discussion here re-constitutes the linguistic analysis which was reduced to a summary in the amicus brief filed by the Law and Linguistics Consortium in that case, and explores the issues which the conclusion of that analysis raised at the symposium.

Keywords: Linguistics, Law -- Interpretation & construction, Child pornography

How to Cite: Kaplan, J. & Green, G. (1995) “Grammar and Inferences of Rationality in Interpreting the Child Pornography Statute”, Washington University Law Review. 73(3).