A Comment on Text, Time and Audience Understanding in Constitutional Law

Abstract

Professor Cunningham, in a provocative memorandum, asks how the legal landscape might change if courts interpreted statutes to reflect average citizens' understanding of statutory language.' This is an intriguing thought experiment and perhaps even a wise proposal. Rather than address Professor Cunningham's experiment directly, however, I would like to consider a variant of it that nicely highlights important issues in my own field, constitutional law. Substituting "the Constitution" for "statutes," we have the following question: What if the audience understanding of rules of, say, contract law, applied to the interpretation of the Constitution?

Keywords

Constitutional law

Share

Authors

Michael C. Dorf (Columbia Law School)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: e736e31cda0aa07fe187c97906c95682