Federal Jurisdiction Not Present When State Seeks Declaration That Federal Law Does Not Preempt State's Regulations, Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 103 S. Ct. 2481 (1983)
Author:
J. Douglas Wilson
(Washington University School of Law)
Case Comment
Federal Jurisdiction Not Present When State Seeks Declaration That Federal Law Does Not Preempt State's Regulations, Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 103 S. Ct. 2481 (1983)
Author:
J. Douglas Wilson
(Washington University School of Law)
Keywords: Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 103 S. Ct. 2481 (1983), Exclusive & concurrent legislative powers, Federal jurisdiction, Preemption (Legislative power), Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, California, United States
Wilson,
J.
(1984) 'Federal Jurisdiction Not Present When State Seeks Declaration That Federal Law Does Not Preempt State's Regulations, Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 103 S. Ct. 2481 (1983)',
Washington University Law Review.
62(2)
:307-319.
Wilson,
J.
Federal Jurisdiction Not Present When State Seeks Declaration That Federal Law Does Not Preempt State's Regulations, Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 103 S. Ct. 2481 (1983). Washington University Law Review. 1984 1;
62(2)
:307-319.
Wilson,
J.
(1984, 1 1). Federal Jurisdiction Not Present When State Seeks Declaration That Federal Law Does Not Preempt State's Regulations, Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 103 S. Ct. 2481 (1983).
Washington University Law Review
62(2)
:307-319.
