Northern Enclosure: State Preference Statute Guiding Local Government Purchasing Practices Qualifies for Immunity Under Market-Participant Doctrine: Big Country Foods v. Board of Education, 952 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1992)
Author:
H. Christopher Boehning
(Washington University School of Law)
Case Comment
Northern Enclosure: State Preference Statute Guiding Local Government Purchasing Practices Qualifies for Immunity Under Market-Participant Doctrine: Big Country Foods v. Board of Education, 952 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1992)
Author:
H. Christopher Boehning
(Washington University School of Law)
Boehning,
H.
(1993) 'Northern Enclosure: State Preference Statute Guiding Local Government Purchasing Practices Qualifies for Immunity Under Market-Participant Doctrine: Big Country Foods v. Board of Education, 952 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1992)',
Washington University Law Review.
71(2)
:455-465.
Boehning,
H.
Northern Enclosure: State Preference Statute Guiding Local Government Purchasing Practices Qualifies for Immunity Under Market-Participant Doctrine: Big Country Foods v. Board of Education, 952 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1992). Washington University Law Review. 1993 1;
71(2)
:455-465.
Boehning,
H.
(1993, 1 1). Northern Enclosure: State Preference Statute Guiding Local Government Purchasing Practices Qualifies for Immunity Under Market-Participant Doctrine: Big Country Foods v. Board of Education, 952 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1992).
Washington University Law Review
71(2)
:455-465.
