Clinical Programs That Allow Both Compensation and Credit: A Model Program for Law Schools

Abstract

In this Article, the authors set out the arguments for and against "credit-plus-pay" clinical programs, categorizing the arguments on both sides as either educational arguments or economic arguments. The authors then develop a model credit-plus-pay program. The authors begin with two fundamental premises. First, every law school should be free to design a curriculum that is best suited to serve its own students and produce competent lawyers. Second, each program offered by a law school should be evaluated on its own educational merits, not on the basis of a rigid litmus test such as compensation.

Keywords

Legal education, United States

Share

Authors

Roy D. Simon Jr. (Washington University School of Law)
Tom Leahy (Loyola University School of Law)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

Peer Review

This article has not been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 38f60cfe0c4082add20a5738f8bf7e5f