Wittgenstein Tests Mr. Justice Holmes: On Holmes’s Proposal to Separate Legal Concepts from Moral Concepts

Abstract

Do the comments of Mr. Justice Holmes on American law interest us today? Are Holmes's remarks on what law is, or about legal education in America and how we might study and learn our legal system, important to today's legal world? If Stanley Cavell is correct in thinking that philosophy—whether old or new— demands a say in testing anything that claims our interest, or that purports to have a place of importance in our lives, then these questions asked of Holmes's writings are genuine philosophical queries.

Keywords

Morality & law, Philosophy of Law, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share

Authors

Thomas D. Eisele (University of Cincinnati College of Law)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • pdf: 265a0d99e2bee59a6a3888b3d28b2015